Dear Patient…

Parent/Guardian

Inglemoor High School
15500 Simonds Rd. NE
Kenmore, WA 98028-4430

November 4, 2010

Re: ATTENDANCE CONFIRMATION letter, Rev. 08/2010

Dear Inglemoor High School

Thank you for your letter making us aware of my child’s year to date excused absence from school due to illness.

I the Parent/Guardian, appreciate the reminder and share your concern about the situation, as I live with the student, monitor her academic progress and attendance, try to help her when she struggles with homework, and care for her when she is ill. As noted in your letter, I the Parent/Guardian was the one who called you each day she was too ill to go to school.

I share your stated concern for my daughter’s academic success.

I must confess to some confusion about your requests to me, “encouraging your student’s regular attendance to school”, and “my support in promoting regular attendance”, and your references to district health policies.

What is the correct action to take when my child is too ill to attend school?

Not being a trained educator, I am unfamiliar with the phrase “attendance intervention”, and also unclear how your offer to disallow my daughter from attending all future classes would further the goal of having her attend all classes.

Sincerely,

Parent/Guardian

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Faking Barack Obama in Seattle

MEMORANDUM

NOVEMBER 3rd, 2010 

TO:        Congress and the Extended Progressive Community
FROM: Barack Obama
RE:        Mid Terms

It’s been a busy time. A time of change. An important time. An important time, of busy change.

I want to pause and reflect on the good news coming out of this election. Most importantly, I want to reassure you that I am doing fine. Michelle, the family and I are doing just fine.

I also want to reinforce the message that this election in no way represents a rejection of our progressive agenda in America, nor does it change my resolve. The hole that I inherited from the Republicans was far deeper than I imagined. The quick action that I took saved the economy from collapse. In time, away from the noise and confusion that Karl Rove, Glenn Beck, FOX and Wall Street create, people will see that without my bold actions things would be much worse.

I understand that the legislative dynamic has changed. I knew this was a risk, but I was elected to fundamentally transform America. It’s easy to become frustrated with the progress of this historic task, especially during these times of change. But as Joe said, this is a big fucking deal.

I view this cycle as a warm-up for 2012. To their credit, the Republicans learned from us how to use the same new media that we used in 2008 to spread a message of hope to spread their message of fear. I want to reinforce that our message is still one of hope. I too am frustrated by the rate that the country can be fundamentally transformed. But the red states are teachable, and history will be on my side.

I understand that some of you will be working on the fundamental transformation of America in new ways. I want to reassume you that the work that is done daily in schools, universities, in the media and in the arts is of great importance. Sometimes the road to progressive change is long, but the youth turnout during my historic election teaches us that a policy of continuous education can pay off.

I will do my part, blocking the agenda of the Republicans and FOX with the power of veto and court appointments. I don’t forget that the bureaucracy tends naturally toward an enlightened progressive agenda, and the positive steps I’ve taken to reinforce this will continue to work in my favor.

In the near term, Michelle and I will recharge a bit after this busy time. Michelle loves to travel,  and golf clears my head.

Barack.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Maybe HopenChangin in Seattle

Election ads. Witch. Whore. Nazi. Good grief.

How dumb do they think we are?

Elections are swung by the most ill-informed voters. People who fail to appreciate the difference between TARP, that probably saved us from banking collapse, and was surprisingly affordable, and Stimulus, which was Nancy Pelosi just going through her entire Rolodex and sending them your childrens’ money. But right now they do have a vague but correct sense that something significant is wrong here – just as they had the correct sense that something was wrong with the Iraq war.

The statists played their hand in a way that was obvious to everyone after the Scott Brown Operation Ram It Down Their Throats Anyway Because We’re Just Smarter debacle.

We dummies didn’t forget that one.

I have no illusions that the GOP have discipline, or that we don’t have big problems in America. Or that the GOP isn’t running some bad candidates.

But once you’ve killed your economy and replaced freedom with a culture of dependence, you’re on your way to irreversible decline.  The self-organization of the Tea Party, who are somewhat represented by the GOP, gives me hope that freedom loving soul of the country is far from dead. Hope that replaces the fear I experienced during the historic election of 2008 surreal Obama True Believer thing 2 years ago. I rather doubt we’ll be selling plates in the cafeteria, and having our children sing songs in school  after the next president is elected. That was some weirdo shit to a Ted Nugent extremist like myself. And I’d seen it before, with Pierre Elliott Trudeau in the old country.

Of course the election of a black president was historic. And overdue. I celebrate that. But did he have to be the most statist president ever?

Despite what Newsweek and condescending academics believe, and cynical democratic strategists pretend to believe, the Tea Party has nothing to do with hostility toward the first black president. Many of us voted for him.  And to our credit, we didn’t take the bait in the face of months of an unwarranted and manipulative harangue. Because the county is proud of fairness and inclusion. We just don’t want to live in a European Social Democracy. If we did, we’d move (back) to Canada.

The racist meme didn’t work. The violent meme didn’t work.

Now we’re at witch.

With any luck, the actions of a leadership predisposed to the creation of liberal social democracy will soon be discredited as ineffective for a long time. And the current leadership as being dangerously idealistic, dishonest and heavy handed in the pursuit of their utopia.  I will take some probably unfair satisfaction watching condescending academics drive their Prii back to their reserved parking spots in condescending academia, and get back to their core competency of convincing young people that they experience with their eyes, ears and brain is all wrong and that America and Somalia are really the same.

For 40 years the most activist and outspoken liberal women have silenced conservative women. And we’ve watched as they championed freedom from dependency on men and replaced it with dependency on the state. But while all this was happening, many women achieved genuine independence. And many freely chose dependency partnership over isolation. But we didn’t hear much about this, because when what you’re selling is too sketchy to withstand an honest discussion, constant browbeating is needed.

The real irony is that Obama’s success systemically transforming the nation toward a European model where everyone is dependent on the state was the trigger that is causing conservative women to break rank and expose the fundamental hypocrisy that modern institutional feminism is about women’s freedom. And this could turn the election.

Of course liberals will retain the moral high ground, because a critical mass of people want more strongly for the religion of statist liberalism to work than they care that it hasn’t. Frankly everyone longs for something that can elevate humanity from the brutishness that is nature. But history should have taught us than giving absolute power to a handful of doesn’t work.

And Barack will have two more years to lose the war in Afghanistan and get us out of there. Fine by me. I haven’t a clue why we’re there and I think we need to (sadly) keep our powder dry for the inevitable Operation Got You Last So If You Don’t Start Nothing There Won’t Be Nothing against a nuclear Iran.

Mike.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Living and Learning in Seattle

About 35% of the US population strongly supports the health care bill. And they tell me that once us dumb rubes really understand that liberal elites know what’s best for the rest of us, we’ll be on fully in board. We just need some book learnin’ an some teachin’ and we be smart like Europeans.

 

So, in interest of advancing the cause of gun clinging bible thumpers everywhere, lets think like elite liberal progressives and see what we can learn.

 

“More care will be available because money that could be delivered as services is wasted on health insurance company overhead and profits.”

 

Seems reasonable. They’re greedy bureaucracies, that’s for sure. Everyone hates insurance companies. But a quick read of the financial statements of the companies shows their profits to be insignificant, and total overhead around 20%. It’s hard to imagine a giant federal bureaucracy being less inefficient than 50 medium size private bureaucracies. So we’re going to go backwards on this one.

 

“Care will not be denied to anyone because government bureaucrats are kind and private sector bureaucrats are greedy.”

 

Probably true, but not for the reasons stated. Government bureaucracies can’t go out of business. Ever. So there’s no real reason to stop spending other people’s money.

 

“Care will be cheaper because governments will wring the profit of the rest of the system (i.e. doctors, hospitals, drug companies, research)”

 

 Eventually true, but this requires significant rationing. Conflicts with Care will not be denied… Can’t have both.

 

“It is better in the aggregate for everyone to have poorer quality care than for some to have good care and others to have poor, or no care.”

 

One of the most honest, and possibly correct arguments. But curiously, you don’t hear about it much.

 

“I’ll benefit because the someone else will be giving me their money”

 

As honest as the previous, and equally unheard. Works fine as long as the demand for other people’s money doesn’t exceed the supply.

 

Mike.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Living and Learning in Amercia (was an expat Canadian’s Tribute To Barak Obama’s Historic Accomplishment)

Over the next four years the health care debate is going to be framed in terms of people being for kindness, or against kindness. Anyone expressing a dissenting opinion is going to be attacked for being amoral, at least until the takeover is firmly institutionalized. To the degree that PR was needed past this point in Canada, the approach was  to combine patriotism, the idea that big government was an expression of kindness, and support for government health care. That said, the primary danger there was that people would see how much better they would be in America, and it was necessary to sell against that. Once all freedom has been lost everywhere, I can only assume no such PR will be necessary.  You can like it or lump it. You can see the leading edge of the badgering now. The bill was only unpopular because the people against kindness mislead the people for kindness. Not because, perhaps, it was unpopular.  The next phase of the government’s takeover of people’s lives is the waiting for the entitlement parts of the bill to take effect. The several year delay between the start of the tax ramp and the bulk of the coverage was key to (the deception of) keeping the CBO costs below 1 trillion dollars for 10 years. Now that the bill is passed, such fiction will no longer be necessary, and the delay is dangerous as people might come to really understand what’s at stake here. The government’s agenda will be to start the entitlements as fast as possible, so as to cause fundamental restructuring of the economy and society. All entitlements pass a point in time when individuals and businesses have adjusted to the new model, and even if a majority comes to believe that the entitlement was a mistake, it can’t be unwound. This phenomena explains the democrats urgency in passing any bill. Any bill. Any bill that either gives them control of the money, either explicitly, by making private care illegal, or implicitly by driving the private sector out of business with taxpayer funded “competition” running at a massive loss, or by proxy, via regulation. Any bill. Because once the process starts, the bureaucracy  on auto-pilot will just grow without bounds, which is the real agenda here. Now like all government wealth transfers, there will be immediate winners and losers. And in the short term, more winners than losers. This is all by design, as structural captures like this require about 10 years of broad goodwill to get past to the point of no return. So there are lots of happy people now.  Let me explain the medium term timeline in terms of winners and losers, assuming we don’t course correct very soon, so that opposition can be understood at least rationally.  0-10 Years For the next 10 years, there will be no losers. The very rich will pay more tax, but they can afford it, and they will remain very rich. The working poor and the unlucky will have new access to health care (the truly poor are already covered and their situation will remain unchanged). The big winners will be the baby boomers, who are leaving the workforce, leaving the taxpaying phase of their lives, and entering the phase of their lives where the most is spent, and the most is to be gained, from healthcare. The boomers will be free from paying for their own care, their childrens’ care, and their parents care. Indeed, their parents will regress a bit as Medicare is tapped to pay for the boomers, but it won’t be noticed. The overall quality of care will remain extremely high by any rational world standard. The new bureaucracy will be “the place to be”, for the government class. The new programs will be well designed, by smart people, constrained be not to be worse than the current alternative. 10-20 Years Every election up to this point will have been won simply by promising more freebees than your opponent. The news will be a continuous narrative about the lack of free access to the latest experimental treatment, and an ever expanding list of quasi “health” ailments. People wanting to be taller, or have a custom genetically engineered baby, or reverse a previous gender change that reversed a previous gender change will organize into lobbying groups, as will the providers of these services. The bureaucracy will be overrun with lobbyists, victims and the news.  Corruption will be on the rise, but it will largely invisible.  The leading edge of truly gigantic debts and deficits will be becoming visible even to casual observer. Legislators and bureaucrats will begin frantically trying to get spiraling costs under control. They will increase taxes, both directly and indirectly. Tax increases will not be popular, but the bulk of the population will have begun to assume both “free” health care and high taxes. The alternative, the promise to end the free health care but keep taxes high to pay down the debt won’t get you elected. The very themes of elections will shift from a debate about the correct amount of government vs. individual freedom, to a debate about who can manage huge government better.  The baby boomers’ parents will be dead, and the boomers will be next. They will organize into the most powerful lobby, and demand the very best care, and get it. Increasingly larger and larger amounts of the health care pool will be devoted to care for boomers in the last 6 months of life. The current crop of 25 year olds will be 35-45 years old. They will begin to understand what has happened since that historic day, March 23rd, 2010. The quality of care will begin top drop, visibly. Judgment and experience at the individual provider level will have been replaced by a rote rule book, rigidly enforced. The times when a provider does exceptional work will be ignored by the bureaucracy, but every mistake will make the rule book thicker. The bureaucracy itself will be overwhelmed, as the task of providing uniform care to 250M people proves to be about as hard as running all of China. The natural evolution of the quality of care taken forgranted now, and provided by the decentralized competitive market will be over. Health care will start to feel like public schools do now. Health care workers will be in a powerful public sector union. From a financial perspective, they will be well cared for. But they will hate the impact rote rules have on their own effectiveness and their lack of input into the bureaucracy. In general, the government class will be better off than the private sector middle class and the gap will be growing. 20-40 Years The boomers will be gone. The current crop of 25 year olds will finally figure out what happened. The combined impact of waves of tax increases reaching lower and lower down the income range, the damage that inefficient central planning does to new wealth generation, and the damage that a no-reward for hard work or entrepreneurialism entitlement culture will have structural damage to the economy. Unemployment will hover around 10%. The very rich will still be very rich. The very poor will still be less poor than they would have otherwise have been. The middle class will see their gross wages stagnate, their net wage decline to taxes, and the purchasing power  of what remains decline due to inflation. Society will become rigidly stratified. Your lot in life will be decided at birth. The government class will still do OK, but it will be virtually impossible to get a job there, except via nepotism (see societal classes, rigidly stratified). The debt left by the boomers will be crushing. Health care will be rationed in the extreme. Long lines. Bad care. People will die. About the only real winners at this stage will be people with treatable diseases who get them early in life. Corruption will be systemic. Now I don’t expect this will change anyone’s mind. People who already get this, already get it. A large number of people stand to gain in year 0-10, and don’t care. And optimists will just ignore it. But, assuming we don’t avert this disaster somehow, someday in the distant future, you’ll be sitting around thinking, “I wonder how he knew, God bless his soul”. I give you my word that I will rise from the grave, and explain to you yet again, that the reason is because I’ve lived it before. Mike.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Keeping it Together in Seattle

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:      The Extended Conscientious Community

FROM: Key Stakeholders in Organizations of Significance (Global)

RE:       Updated Talking Points: Addressing the Key Issues in the new Climate of Uncertain Momentum, Regulatory and Media Compliance

 

Thank you for your continued engagement on this life or death issue. We’re close to victory here team. But recent blog activity has called undue attention to the radical right wing theories put forward by M&M and Climate Audit and, left unchecked, could slow critical momentum on regulatory efforts. It’s worth pointing out that the future economic/regulatory/capital environment assumed by many who anticipate and plan for a progressive Green Economy is at risk without key follow-through here.

 

We are, as we always have been, outspent and under constant attack from the less progressive corporations and a backward looking Republican party leadership catering to their unscientific religious base. It is critical that we retain the needed mindshare and momentum in the media. And to do this, we must stay on message. To this end, the following talking points have been deemed to be effective at this time.

 

Please review the material enough to be comfortable both in ad-hoc discussions and in the press. As always, variation in the order and wording of these points is permissible and even recommended for the newswire, but the tone and key points should remain constant.

 

1.       These are complex issues. Reinforce that most scientists agree the earth is warming, and the cause is manmade. Manmade is the preferred terminology here, ideally replacing CO2. If pressed, it is acceptable to say that CO2 levels in the atmosphere continue to rise, and that CO2 is known greenhouse gas. Further specifics should be avoided, and repetition that "most scientists agree” is an effective technique. It’s worth noting that the term climate change never really caught on and is deprecated, as it has the potential to confuse.

 

2.       In forums where more detail is helpful, it’s useful to assert with confidence that the data still shows that the earth is warming. The previous messaging of the hottest interval  on record is still effective at implying a trend, but it’s critical that the interval be decade and not year, month etc. When pressed, reinforce the reality that measuring average global temperatures is complex, and that patterns need to be gleaned by using statistical methods and experts. And most statisticians who have looked at the data agree the earth is warming. It is not recommended that any more detail be offered here, although as always, repetition is a handy tool in many situations. The phase hide the decline is to be avoided, and just ignoring it is simple and effective.

 

3.       Less is more on UEA, Mann, Jones, M&M tree rings or hockey sticks.  If pressed, fall back to the position that while there is some uncertainty, most scientists agree the earth is warming, and given the cause is manmade and the consequences the very survival of life on this planet, caution would suggest that we take what steps we can, while we can. Not to act would be immoral, and we will be judged harshly by history.

 

4.       Republicans are backward and unscientific and hence, fall easily under the corrupting influence of BigEnergy. While biblical references are not suggested, the general tone that this is a goliath and david struggle is helpful.

 

5.       The momentum on regulation is unstoppable. The general strategy here is to demoralize any grass roots opposition that might be captured by BigEnergy, the GOP, fiscal conservatives and/or organizations that claim to defend "individual liberty". Some practice here is required, as a sense of fate is helpful, but a condescending tone could trigger an unwarranted backlash, especially among the less educated and more poorly informed.

 

We can still win this one.

 

Thanks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Propaganda 101

Perhaps now we can have a reasonable discussion. Let’s look at how we got here so we can better understand the events that are going to unfold next.

 

For about 20 years, the earth was warming at a historically alarming rate. Concurrent with this, levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, a known greenhouse gas, were rising gradually and linearly. Credible theories were put forward that these might be related. Legit science started developing climate models. The vast majority of these failed to predict the future retroactively by feeding them actual data from the past (i.e. they were useless). But this should not be surprising given how complex the system is. 

 

But they showed mostly a gradual, and not especially concerning increase in temperature.

 

Along comes Michael Mann and his pals, who introduce the idea that the system has an inherent instability point in the future that fundamentally and irreversibly alters the climate feedback loop and locks us into doomsday. The hockeystick.

 

Here’s where it gets interesting. Al Gore decides that this is his time and his crisis, and he begins to both promote it and exploit it for money, power and fame (MPF). He builds an alliance between reasonable concerned people, environmental fanatics, anti-progress fanatics, anti-humanity  fanatics, people jealous of their neighbor’s SUVthe media, Hollywood, big business, people around the globe in love with the idea of BigGovernment, and of course actual global BigGovernment. The only people not on board were China and India, who had nothing to gain and lots to lose by restricting energy usage.

 

It’s an amazing story. Perhaps the best bit of marketing and propaganda in the history of humanity, outside of the major religions. It was a brilliant crisis. It had science cred. It threatened our children. It was impossible for the average Joe to prove, or disprove, of frankly even trust their own senses and common sense.  It required dramatic action that could only happen via a  coordinated effort from all of the planet’s BigGovernments.  Results were impossible to measure. It was impossible to determine how much global BigGovernment was required. It could be dragged out for 100 years. A EuroProtoSocialist wet dream sort of a crisis.

 

All based on an unproven theory that CO2 might be causing the earth to warm, and that there might be a tipping point that makes this irreversible.

 

Next the big money enters in a big way, and BigGovernments plan sweeping control over the primary engine of modern lifestyle, energy. European social democracy BigGovernment types, as usual, lead the path and do major damage to their economies by distorting markets. Canada pretends to play but is smart enough to avoid any real damage by keeping the oil sands pumping and sifting and generally being a leader in missed Kyoto targets, all while passing lots of stupid but meaningless feel good enviro restrictions on things like idling, lightbulbs and grocery bags.

 

But the earth has a different plan and a bloody good sense of humor. Around 1998, the warmest year on record (admittedly a local outlier) , the temp increases flattens out. It stays flat for about 6 years, then it starts to decline. The rate of decline increases. All while CO2 just continues to grow linearly. None of this proves, or disproves either a dangerous long term warming trend, or CO2 as cause. What it does do is drive  a stake through the heart of the validity of climate modeling. None of the models predicted this (I assume). In fact, they predicted the opposite. As of 2005, the very core of the science that drove the IPCC, and global BigGovernments’ drive to regulate everything was completely bankrupt.

 

At this point the scientific community continued to behave like a scientific community,  and question if this is how things actually work. And they learned a great deal about how things actually work. The response was excommunication, at many levels, up to and including continued employment of anyone who didn’t toe the line. We got "settled science” and “consensus” and “deniers”. And we got the books cooked. Possibly by only a handful of scientists, but the ones who had sold their souls to the global BigGovernment movement through its central planning brain, the UN’s IPCC, presumably for some MPF.

 

These facts have been visible for more than 5 years. But you had to look. And then you had to get over the condescending put downs and attacks on your objectivity, intelligence, morality impartiality, and in some cases your wallet. Some did. Thank you.

 

This started to change about 2 weeks ago.

 

You are now seeing three different communities react to these events:

 

The professionals want both revenge, and a return to the normalcy of science.  

 

The man on the street, having been disingenuously taught to judge the advance of warming via the frequency and nature of extreme weather, and by weather patterns in general, has formed an opinion over 10 years that the earth doesn’t seem to be warming. In fact, it might be cooling. It’s curious how the untrained, given time and the freedom to think, actually conclude that that they think is happening, is what’s happening. This group is now realizing that they were duped by environmentalists, science, politicians, the media and General Electric.

 

And BigGovernment itself will try to exploit the tail end of the crisis by grabbing your money and your freedom for all it’s worth before it’s too late.

 

Mike, quoting Mike from two years ago: "My predication here is that once the hype-o-meter peeks, the media is going to flip the story into "the data was manipulated, science fails, etc etc". "

 

But don’t worry, these clowns can be trusted with your health. They are smarter than you.

 

Mike.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment